Search for: "Austin v. Davis"
Results 101 - 120
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week, a class action lawsuit entitled Gary B. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
This was the question facing the UK Information Tribunal recently in Queen Mary University of London v (1) The Information Commissioner and (2) Alem Matthees. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
In Voisine v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:50 am
Tyrone Davis, No. 13-30133 (6-13-16)(en banc)(Paez for majority; concurrence by Christen and others; dissent by Bea). [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
As already mentioned, on the same day Lord Thomas CJ and Nicola Davies J gave judgment on remedy in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast Publications Ltd. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Many facets of Wednesday’s oral argument in the Fisher v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall looks ahead at Evenwel v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 5:01 am
University of Texas at Austin and Spokeo v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 a few weeks ago, in Walker v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Jennifer Davis persuasively argues that changing economic and social conditions allowed the courts, in trade mark cases, to abandon a view of consumers as heterogeneous and divided by class, education and income and instead to assume the existence of an average consumer whose perceptions were key. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Jennifer Davis: maybe no empirical evidence is ever probative—different approaches include psychologists, polling, neurologists, linguists. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Jennifer Davis: class consciousness among judges in English law of 19th c. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
As noted in the New York Times’ editorial, Justice Anthony Kennedy seized the opportunity to write a concurring opinion in Davis v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
