Search for: "Austin v. Neal"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Depicted above is the cover to America v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:41 am
Baron recalled that the Texas Supreme Court observed in O’Neal v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 12:04 am
Partner at Sidley Austin. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 2:12 pm
As a result, he argues that the Duren v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:05 am
CAR and Ball v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:11 am
KF 385 ZC2 D57 2012 Dissenting judgments in the law / edited by Neal Geach and Christopher Monaghan. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
After OSG, Sidley Austin, Kirkland & Ellis and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher are the three most frequent firms of record, listed four times apiece. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Tags: Accountability, No-action letters, Public interest, SEC, Securities regulation, Transparency Executive Long-Term Incentive Plans Posted by Joseph Kieffer, Equilar Inc., on Thursday, April 11, 2019 Tags: Compensation ratios, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Management, Pay for performance The SEC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Solicitor General Neal K. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Perry Homes v Cull. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
: how the case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
The Evil Spirits of the Modern Daily Press (Puck Magazine 1888)On October 18, 2018, I participated in a presentation entitled “Free Speech and Originalist Jurisprudence” at the University of Wisconsin-Stout along with Professor Alan Bigel (UW-Lacrosse). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
Peter Austin has shown, by Monte Carlo simulation, that categorizing a continuous variable in a logistic regression results in inflating the rate of finding false positive associations.[11] The type I (false-positive) error rates increases with sample size, with increasing correlation between the confounding variable and outcome of interest, and the number of categories used for the continuous variables. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
Solicitor General Neal K. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
