Search for: "Austin v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,959
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 6:13 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in National Advertising of Austin v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm
Supreme Court justices found it, in his words, "beyond rationale debate," in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
The employer-respondent will be represented by Carter Phillips of Sidley Austin, LLP. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
SEC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 8:07 am
Georgia and Gregg v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 10:57 am
—Austin 2016), rev’d per curiam, 567 S.W.3d 327 (Tex. 2019); Prize Energy Res., L.P. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:51 pm
Just four years ago, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:34 pm
Reagan Outdoor Advertising, Inc v City of Austin, 2023 WL 270582 (5th Circ. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
The 1998, Austin Court of Appeals opinion in the case styled, "Great Texas County Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 5:18 am
" Yesterday's ruling of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in State v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:04 am
-Austin 1989, no writ). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:20 pm
University of Texas at Austin by clicking here, and selecting “Track this Docket. [read post]
Texas’ Recognition of an Out-of-State Divorce Decree: A Look into the Court of Appeals’ Approach
17 Jan 2014, 10:35 am
—Austin Oct. 28, 2010, no pet.) [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
In Austin v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
Speech First v UTA Case 19-50529. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 11:57 pm
Way to go Austin! [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:01 am
This fall, the United States Supreme Court will reconsider the issue of affirmative action in higher education for the first time since its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:01 am
This fall, the United States Supreme Court will reconsider the issue of affirmative action in higher education for the first time since its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]