Search for: "Autocam Corp. v. Sebelius" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2013, 11:16 am
 Last week we reported the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals’ dismissal of Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:54 am by Howard Friedman
 The court held that circuit's prior decision in Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:46 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court seeking review of the 6th Circuit's decision in Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 10:29 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rejected a corporation’s free exercise claim in Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:14 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 8:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled against a for-profit employer’s challenge to the contraception mandate in Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:38 pm by Joy Waltemath
Autocam Corp. v Sebelius involved similar RFRA and free exercise arguments against the contraceptive coverage requirement. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:28 am by Joy Waltemath
As the government notes, this question is “of exceptional importance concerning asserted RFRA rights of for-profit corporations,” and points out that contrary holdings have been reached by both the Third and Sixth Circuits in the Conestoga Wood and Autocam Corp. v Seblious cases. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 2:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The third case (Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The petition in that case is Autocam Corp. v. [read post]