Search for: "Axe v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 6:50 am
Heath notes that this technology was mentioned in the recent Tenth Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
In a landmark 2018 decision, Epic Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:41 pm
One of United's policies stated that if “there is any reason you would not be perceived as an unbiased investigator, choose another investigator. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
The views of the United States and other interested states might, however, deviate along two axes: the debate about whether all uses of force constitute armed attacks and the debate about what requirements must be met before a state acts in collective self-defense of another state. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:17 am
United States, Weyhrauch v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
Rooks v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
That’s great – everyone has had a little more time to chi–ll–ax and focus on what really matters. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States, unless one of [a number of] exceptions applies to the particular statement being made. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 1:53 pm
From a motion filed today in Doe v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 4:58 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court is engaged in behavior never before seen in American history argues Mark Lemley, the William H. [read post]
16 May 2023, 4:00 am
We affirm the three-judge panel’s Harper v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:58 pm
New Zealand also permitted Facebook service after failed attempts at in-person notice in Axe Market Gardens v Craig Axe CIV: 2008-485-2676 and Canada did the same in Knott v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 3:51 pm
Such an arrangement is not found elsewhere within the United States—whether one considers the federal government, the states, or even counties and municipalities—nor is it readily found elsewhere outside of the United States, except perhaps in extreme situations such as post-war occupation or the international refusal to recognize a geopolitical group’s sovereignty in the first instance. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:40 pm
”ProtectionismWhat she forgot to mention is that the United States routinely issues such licences, albeit through their courts which refuse to grant patent injunctions on grounds of public interest. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm
Rooks v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:24 am
The banks submitted affidavits demonstrating that they had no activity or customers in the United States, and therefore they should not be subject to personal jurisdiction in the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:17 am
United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm
Given the nature of the Brady violation with respect to the known but undisclosed prior bad act, i.e., the courier information, in the context of this trial the undisclosed information is not material, not only because the information was vague, but also because it is so similar to the disclosures already provided: the information withheld is merely cumulative of equally impeaching evidence introduced at trial as held in United States v Spinelli. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 4:29 am
" Their findings are rich across a bunch of different axes, but for present purpose, one conclusion is key: "The data Trump cited in his speech to the Joint Session of Congress simply don’t support his claims that a 'vast majority' of individuals on the list came from outside the United States—unless, that is, you include individuals who were forcibly brought to the United States in order to be… [read post]
