Search for: "Axe v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm
Given the nature of the Brady violation with respect to the known but undisclosed prior bad act, i.e., the courier information, in the context of this trial the undisclosed information is not material, not only because the information was vague, but also because it is so similar to the disclosures already provided: the information withheld is merely cumulative of equally impeaching evidence introduced at trial as held in United States v Spinelli. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
On May 17, 1934, the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs debated the terms of the IRA. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 4:29 am
" Their findings are rich across a bunch of different axes, but for present purpose, one conclusion is key: "The data Trump cited in his speech to the Joint Session of Congress simply don’t support his claims that a 'vast majority' of individuals on the list came from outside the United States—unless, that is, you include individuals who were forcibly brought to the United States in order to be… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am
As he noted, “The President has not persuasively explained why, if executive privilege did not preclude enforcement of the subpoena issued in [United States v.] [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:01 pm
A copy of the full order and analysis in the Spencer v Hartford case. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
I very strongly doubt that any non-Japanese -- the "Asian" referred to in the complaint -- would be drawn from India or China into a rotation into the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:41 am
" In Richardson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm
Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. 2. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm
Demner, The Nuclear Terrorism Convention: Will Detainees Be Classified as "Enemy Combatants" by the United States Harvard Law Review, Volume 120, Number 1, November 2006 Neal Kumar Katyal, Hamdan v. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices seem primed to find constitutional limits on the detention of immigrants
4 Oct 2017, 9:44 am
Deputy Solicitor General Malcom Stewart began for the United States by “stress[ing] the breadth of Congress’s constitutional authority to establish the rules under which aliens will be allowed to enter and remain in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
United States cases and its more recent plurality opinion in Chavez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
However, starting with United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:16 am
Can any state sue the United States? [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Along the way, the Court also took an axe to its 1944 ruling in Korematsu v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:08 am
There are many famous and significant footnotes in American jurisprudence, like Footnote 4 in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:28 pm
In The Last Best Beef, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 pm
But the maker had has registered the label/mark with the United States Patent and Trademark office. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
Thirteen years later, in United States v. [read post]
