Search for: "Axe v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Given the nature of the Brady violation with respect to the known but undisclosed prior bad act, i.e., the courier information, in the context of this trial the undisclosed information is not material, not only because the information was vague, but also because it is so similar to the disclosures already provided: the information withheld is merely cumulative of equally impeaching evidence introduced at trial as held in United States v Spinelli. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by bryannewland
On May 17, 1934, the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs debated the terms of the IRA. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 4:29 am by Benjamin Wittes
" Their findings are rich across a bunch of different axes, but for present purpose, one conclusion is key: "The data Trump cited in his speech to the Joint Session of Congress simply don’t support his claims that a 'vast majority' of individuals on the list came from outside the United States—unless, that is, you include individuals who were forcibly brought to the United States in order to be… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am by Steve Vladeck
As he noted, “The President has not persuasively explained why, if executive privilege did not preclude enforcement of the subpoena issued in [United States v.] [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
I very strongly doubt that any non-Japanese -- the "Asian" referred to in the complaint -- would be drawn from India or China into a rotation into the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm by Shelley Brown
Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. 2. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm
Demner, The Nuclear Terrorism Convention: Will Detainees Be Classified as "Enemy Combatants" by the United States Harvard Law Review, Volume 120, Number 1, November 2006 Neal Kumar Katyal, Hamdan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:44 am by Kevin Johnson
Deputy Solicitor General Malcom Stewart began for the United States by “stress[ing] the breadth of Congress’s constitutional authority to establish the rules under which aliens will be allowed to enter and remain in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 pm by Barry Barnett
 But the maker had has registered the label/mark with the United States Patent and Trademark office. [read post]