Search for: "Axe v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
I blogged here about United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
I blogged here about United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 11:41 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
This is due, Pinker states, because of two actions of the mind: chunking and functional fixity. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:50 am
Heath notes that this technology was mentioned in the recent Tenth Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:33 am
United States, the Facebook threats case, will be argued next week. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
The review will reportedly examine how the United States engages with families of those kidnapped, its methods of intelligence collection, and its diplomatic missions to rescue hostages. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm
Rooks v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
Rooks v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998). [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:08 am
There are many famous and significant footnotes in American jurisprudence, like Footnote 4 in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am
Federal Election Commission, and filled in some new details about the behind-the-scenes maneuvering that led to the Citizens United decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:39 pm
§ 1514A; Lawson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Indeed, there at least two axes on which one might imagine opposition in Congress—interstate federalism and partisan posturing. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:45 am
Yesterday the Court heard argument in Lawson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
Trainmen v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm
Given the nature of the Brady violation with respect to the known but undisclosed prior bad act, i.e., the courier information, in the context of this trial the undisclosed information is not material, not only because the information was vague, but also because it is so similar to the disclosures already provided: the information withheld is merely cumulative of equally impeaching evidence introduced at trial as held in United States v Spinelli. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States, unless one of [a number of] exceptions applies to the particular statement being made. [read post]
