Search for: "B. v. S." Results 201 - 220 of 52,218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2008, 1:31 pm
" An excerpt from Steve's post: I think Gordon's got an excellent point. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:47 am by Emily Curran
On Monday, the Court issued its decision in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:39 am
Aspinall's Club Ltd v Al-Zayat (No 2) [2008] EWHC 2101 (Comm); [2008] WLR (D) 301 “A fixed-term deferral or postponement of a sum owed to a gaming club by a patron amounted to the providing or allowing of credit contrary to s 16(1)(b) of the Gaming Act 1968. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:08 am by Docket Navigator
Given the Supreme Court’s narrow interpretation of the terms 'action' and 'complaint' in [BP America Production Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:32 am
Regina v Fazal Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A defendant who allowed another person, B, to lodge, receive, retain or withdraw money which amounted to criminal property from the defendant's bank account, was to be regarded as having criminally converted that property. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 11:57 am by Jessica Preis
What was Bugarin’s relationship with the artist and how did…Read more Case Preview: Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 11:57 am by Jessica Preis
What was Bugarin’s relationship with the artist and how did…Read more Case Preview: Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm by Kali Borkoski
The transcript in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:52 am
Ltd. in respect of its use of the following sign:The claimant's marks had been registered in the UK and at OHIM for various goods and services for may years and it brought proceedings under s.10 (2) (b) and (3) of [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:18 am
Egan v Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals NHS Trust [2008] EWCA Civ 1424; [2008] WLR (D) 394 “Once an employee had shown that a manual handling operation at work carried some risk of injury, for the purposes of reg 4(1)(b) of the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992, the burden of proof was on the [...] [read post]