Search for: "B. v. S." Results 281 - 300 of 52,456
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2024, 1:24 pm by Allan Blutstein
Tex.) -- denying FDA’s summary judgment motion after concluding that the agency’s search for records pertaining to Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine improperly omitted the agency’s Emergency Use Authorization file.Intercept Media v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 6:29 am by Söğüt Atilla
Guest UPCKat John Snape (Carpmaels) summarised the UPC Court of Appeal’s opt-out decision in AIM v Supponor. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 12:26 am by JR Chaves
De tal manera que como terminó la fase administrativa previa sin que se negase la falta de legitimación en esa vía administrativa o la falta de representación, no es admisible que en vía jurisdiccional la Administración local vaya contra sus actos propios y pretenda negar en vía judicial la representación o la legitimación activa que no negó en la vía administrativa»; y B)… [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 12:19 am by Marty Hansen and Paul Maynard
This guidance is broadly consistent with the EDPB’s analysis in its 2019 joint opinion with the EDPS on the CLOUD Act. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 11:42 pm by Robin Verma
V oss on Delaware Contract Law Delaware contract law frequently governs the formation, interpretation, and enforcement of high-stakes commercial agreements throughout the United States; it also underpins the nation’s predominant corporation and business entities laws. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 1:44 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
This point was not appealed.Mercato Centrale also counter-claimed that the word mark should be cancelled on the ground that it was accepted for registration on the basis of evidence and representations that were false in material particulars (s 62(b) of the Trade Marks Act). [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Notice Kant's use of the phrase is, in a sense, diametrically opposed to Hobbes's. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 12:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Timothy Roes, Strasbourg Observers: Missaoui and Akhandaf v Belgium: Cold Shower for Belgian Applications: on the recent ECtHR case in which a claim by two Belgium Muslim women against a ban on burkinis in Antwerp was deemed inadmissible. [read post]