Search for: "B. v. S." Results 41 - 60 of 52,363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2025, 5:46 am by Marcel Pemsel
Armani invoked a likelihood of confusion (Art. 8(1)(b) EUTMR) with its trade mark’s goods in class 9 and asserted an infringement of its trade mark with a reputation for the goods in class 25 of its earlier mark (Art. 8(5) EUTMR). [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 1:20 pm
You can likely understand why a court might well come to that conclusion, as the district court did when it granted the City's motion for summary judgment and as the Ninth Circuit did when it affirmed that result.So reasonable minds might well agree on that outcome.The rub, though, is the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. [read post]
Mark evidence as State’s Exhibit ___________________ Questions: I show you what has been marked for identification as State’s exhibit ___________. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Based on the findings above, the Commission found that Petitioner engaged in "willful or persistent conduct clearly inconsistent with the proper performance of his duties, casting public discredit upon the judiciary and the administration of justice in violation of Canons 2A, 2B, 3B(2), 3B(4), 3B(5), 3B(6), 3B(8), 3B(10), 4A(1), and 4A(2) of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, Section 33.001(b)(5) of the Texas Government Code, and Article V, Section 1-a(6)(A) of the Texas… [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 9:17 am by Giles Peaker
Section 13(1)(b) provided that s.13 applied to (b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period. [read post]