Search for: "B. v. S." Results 121 - 140 of 52,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2013, 11:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
LaSalle Hotel Operating P’ship, L.P., 380 F.3d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 2004). (...)Precedent guides that if BB&Bs advertising state- ment is literally false, it may be actionable “without reference to the advertisement’s impact on the buying public. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:41 am
R v C [2009] UKHL 42; [2009] WLR (D) 272 “The words of s 30(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 ‘or for any other reason’ were wide enough to include an irrational fear preventing the free exercise of choice, and inability to communicate the choice made within s 30(2)(b) was not limited to physical inability. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
The government argued that the sentence should be reviewed for an abuse of discretion, while Solomon argued that his sentence must be reviewed for "reasonableness" under United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:24 am by Unknown
According to the petitioners, the Second Circuit’s expansion of Section 10(b) liability conflicts with the Supreme Court’s precedents. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
This year the Supreme Court Historical Society’s Frank C. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:40 am by Kent Scheidegger
Buenrostro, No. 08-16185, the Ninth Circuit shoots down an attempt to use FRCP 60(b) to evade AEDPA's successive petition rule. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:29 am by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure sale — Motion for leave to file counterclaim On October 15, 2013, substitute trustees filed, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, an action to foreclose on residential property owned by Edward B. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am by Family Law
From American Songwriter: Before we had Gwen Stefani teaching us how to spell “b-a-n-a-n-a-s” in “Hollaback Girl,” there was Tammy Wynette spelling out the pains of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:53 am by immigrationprof
Wydra, Chief Counsel, Constitutional Accountability Center The headlines coming out of last week’s arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 7:05 am
On the 404(b) applicability, the court surveys many cases: The Court's independent research has not revealed any cases addressing the issue in the context of Miranda violations. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:10 am by Michelle Harner
It is against this backdrop that I recently read and considered the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision in Binks v. [read post]