Search for: "BANKS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 9:57 am
I expressed surprise when the California Supreme Court granted review in Pineda v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 12:19 pm
The action, Michel Rapoport v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Bank of America, no. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm
Bank of America, no. [read post]
18 May 2022, 3:13 pm
In Bergstrom v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:16 am
First California Bank v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
The cert. petition seeks to overturn the California Supreme Court's decision in Rose v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:08 am
Concepcion (April 27, 2011), the Supreme Court held, 5-to-4, that California's Discover Bank rule is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:56 pm
On December 17, 2010, in Duran v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:00 am
Bank National Association, no. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
In Glaski v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:16 pm
The case, Salazar v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:31 pm
In Duran v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:27 am
No, said the court of appeal in Ramanathan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:07 am
John Cochrane and Stephen Bainbridge on Dodd-Frank reform in a new administration; Gift of insider information to friends or family is insider trading, rules SCOTUS in Salman v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
In Richardson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court put Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:50 pm
Parks v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:06 pm
OppFi’s complaint alleges that because the Bank and not OppFi is making the Program Loans and the Bank is a state-chartered FDIC-insured bank located in Utah, the Bank is authorized by Section 27(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to charge interest on its loans, including loans to California residents, at a rate allowed by Utah law regardless of any California law imposing a lower interest rate limit. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:54 pm
In Discover Bank v. [read post]
