Search for: "BANKS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al" Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Al Rajhi Bank 13-318Issue: (1) Whether the civil remedy provision of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Pharmaceutical cases that warrant federal court multi-district litigation (MDL) treatment typically involve complex scientific and statistical issues. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
In Huras v Primerica Financial Services Limited[13]an agreement on settlement was reached which provided small compensation to each member of the large group of class members.[14]  The settlement provided for additional compensation to be paid to the Ontario and British Columbia RPs – $3000 and $2000 respectively.[15]  By way of contract, in Sutherland, Justice Winkler disallowed a claim where the RP sought compensation for work related to the administration of the… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by Lyle Denniston
California, 11-290) argued that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
Amicus brief of Columbia Legal Services et al. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:20 am by Chris Jones
Bank of America, et al. and 2433 South Blvd. v Bank of America, et al. now pending in the Federal Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, and which were recently the subject of motions to dismiss. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Harper, et al., The Law of Torts §§ 25.1, at 493 (2d ed. 1986)] (‘Harper’). [read post]