Search for: "BANKS v. TEXAS" Results 21 - 40 of 1,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
  It is like blaming the State of Texas for the migrant crisis when the federal government refuses to the close the border or Congress fails to solve the problem. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Activist, Advance Notice Bylaw, Blasius, Bylaw, Chancery, Coster, Kellner, Schnell, Stockholder, Unocal When Myopic Managers Must Mark to Market Posted by Adam Kolasinski (Texas A&M University), and Nan Yang (Hong Kong Polytechnic University), on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Banks, CEOs, Executives, Liquidity CSRD… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Activist, Advance Notice Bylaw, Blasius, Bylaw, Chancery, Coster, Kellner, Schnell, Stockholder, Unocal When Myopic Managers Must Mark to Market Posted by Adam Kolasinski (Texas A&M University), and Nan Yang (Hong Kong Polytechnic University), on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Banks, CEOs, Executives, Liquidity CSRD… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 6:12 am by Mark S. Humphreys
 This is illustrated in the 1994, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Fredonia State Bank v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
When the bank fails, the FDIC takes over, seeks to recoup the money the bank was owed. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]