Search for: "BINGHAM v. BINGHAM" Results 41 - 60 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2007, 9:02 am
The difficulty with partially fraudulent claims, which we have been trying to articulate on this blog, has it turns out already been elegantly expressed by Bingham LJ (as he then was) in Saunders v Edwards 1987 1 WLR 1116:"On the one hand it is unacceptable that any Court of Law should aid or lend its authority to a party seeking to pursue or enforce an object or agreement which the law prohibits. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:47 am by Jonathan D. Montag
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals put another nail in the visa waiver adjustment coffin last week in yet-another case, Bingham v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Some people decry the "softening" of the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:42 am
The key piece of evidence in a domestic violence prosecution is a 911 call from the victim in which she says she was beat up by her boyfriend. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:46 am by Federalist Society
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 1:07 am
Bingham, Never-ending Story: The African Commission Evolving through Practice in Malawi Africa Association, et al v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:06 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Tugendhat today handed down a short judgment in the case of Gold v Cox ([2012] EWHC 272 (QB)) explaining why he made an interim order to prevent the publication of private and confidential information about Jacqueline Gold, the high-profile Chief Executive of Ann Summers. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:16 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Nealon’s Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas Opinion in the case of Bingham v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 7:42 pm
On the 18th June the House of Lords handed down their opinions IN THE CAUSE R v Davies (Appellant) (On appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) I quote from the speech of Lord Bingham, the senior law lord at paragraph 5 : It is a long-established principle of the English common law that, subject to certain exceptions and statutory qualifications, the defendant in a criminal trial should be confronted by his accusers in order that he may cross-examine them and challenge… [read post]