Search for: "BMG Rights Management v. Cox Communications" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
In a brief comment, the attorney representing Grumpy Cat Limited stated that “Grumpy Cat feels vindicated and feels the jury reached a just verdict”.February opened with a very important decision from the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals which reversed a $25 million verdict against the US Internet Service Provider Cox Communications in what might have been seen as a defeat for record label BMG, which had sought to hold Cox liable for… [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am by Ben
 And at first instance BMG prevailed and in August 2016 Cox Communications were ordered to pay a $25 million dollar penalty for copyright infringements to the music rights management company by a federal judge. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:15 am by Heather Smith-Carra
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a decision in the case, BMG Rights Management LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:15 am by Heather Smith-Carra
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a decision in the case, BMG Rights Management LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 1:05 am by Jani Ihalainen
The US Court of Appeals took on this question earlier this month.The case of BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v Cox Communications dealt with Cox who are an internet service provider for roughly 4.5 million users. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:59 am by John Delaney and Aaron Rubin
In the appeal of the dispute between BMG and Cox Communications regarding Cox’s liability for its users’ alleged downloading of copyrighted material using Cox’s Internet service, the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument last year and a decision should come down this year. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
SIRIUS XM 2nd Cir.CA on common law performance rights https://t.co/5l0tP2RYmz -> Link to attorney fee award for BMG in copyright case BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT v COX COMMUNICATIONS https://t.co/XbRPgJty04 -> Possession and not ownership sufficient for standing to bring trade secret claim in US BladeROOM v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
SIRIUS XM 2nd Cir.CA on common law performance rights https://t.co/5l0tP2RYmz -> Link to attorney fee award for BMG in copyright case BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT v COX COMMUNICATIONS https://t.co/XbRPgJty04 -> Possession and not ownership sufficient for standing to bring trade secret claim in US BladeROOM v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:01 pm by Kerry Sheehan
This statement comes on the heels of another industry attempt to turn ISPs into draconian copyright enforcers in the BMG Rights Management v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 10:57 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiff in this action, BMG Rights Management (US) LLC (“BMG”), seeks to hold Cox Communications, Inc. and CoxCom, LLC (collectively, “Cox”) secondarily liable for the reproduction and distribution of 1,397 musical composition copyrights by users of Cox’s high-speed internet service between February 2, 2012 and November 26, 2014. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
BMG said Cox's network continued to be used by its customers for massive copyright infringement, undermining BMG's music sales. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:25 am by Ben
The lawsuit follows on the heels of a similar complaint by fellow Internet provider RCN, which also seeks legal clarity in the wake of several conflicting decisions on whether or not Internet provider can be held liable for subscribers who share pirated file - but clearly prompted by the decision of a Virginia federal jury - in a case brought by BMG Rights Management against Cox Communications - who answered in the affirmative. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:30 pm by Annemarie Bridy
               On December 1, a federal court in Virginia entered partial summary judgment for music publisher BMG in BMG Rights Management v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
"More on safe habour: In the US, BMG and Round Hill Music continue with their action agaisnt cable company Cox Communications over its alleged inaction in forwarding warning letters to suspected file-sharers. [read post]