Search for: "BONE v. UNITED STATES" Results 201 - 220 of 562
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It has been consistently recognized by the courts of this State that there is an overriding need of a custodial parent and children to occupy and remain in the marital residence, which needs outweighs the non-custodial Page 26 parent's desire to receive any immediate proceeds from its sale (see Nissen v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am by Ben
"Judge Learned Hand United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitInspiration or appropriation? [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm by Rory Little
The city claims that there are over a hundred “similar” ordinances or statutes across the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
  The Ninth Circuit swung mightily and missed with McClellan v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:37 pm by Donald Clarke
The latter point has attracted a great deal of commentary to date, but some of that commentary has overlooked important details, so please don’t forget to read Section V at the end. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Background to the Story On October 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia determined that NAGPRA does not apply to the requested repatriation of Jim Thorpe’s remains. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:03 am by David DePaolo
The old neck bone is connected to the back bone is connected to the chest bone is connected to the hip bone is connected to the leg bone, etc. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:30 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 The United States … argues that the information sought pursuant to the subpoena is relevant to the elements that it must prove…. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
On Friday, Zoe Bedell summarized the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights on extraditions to the United States: Trabelsi v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:20 am by SHG
A sweet start to the statement of facts in United States v. [read post]