Search for: "BONE v. UNITED STATES" Results 361 - 380 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
Bones of contention: Ali Hendrick's mark in Case O-307/11 Request for information. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Bexis
Connex-Metalna Management Consulting GmbH, 302 F.3d 358, 365 (5th Cir. 2002) (quoting United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:11 pm by Andrew Tidwell-Neal
The 8th amendment to the United States Constitution states "excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm by FDABlog HPM
Koustas – We have previously reported (here, here, here, and here) on the court struggle in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) between FDA and Regenerative Sciences, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The provisions of this Treaty shall not give rise to a right on the part of any private person to obtain, suppress, or exclude any evidence, or to impede the execution of a request.The government put some meat on the bones of its argument by citing United States v. $734,578.82 in US Currency, 286 F.3d 641 (3d Cir. 2002), and United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:43 pm by Jim Walker
  An appellate court affirmed his conviction in the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm by Russell Jackson
  Indeed, the fact that the individual unit that the plaintiff owned may no longer be available is irrelevant; the plans and other units of the product are available from which the plaintiff -- usually through expert testimony -- can make her case. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:25 am by Bexis
“[T]he failure was that the bone . . . did not unite before the screws broke. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
(Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bone Care – Court denies summary judgment in favor of bench trial: Bone Care, Int’l v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
  It took the Vaccine Act to bury those.We saw it again in Bone Screw litigation, pre-Lohr. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
United States that the appeal was waived for procedural reasons and in any case, the VA's actions were not the proximate cause of Gerald's stroke. [read post]