Search for: "BORN v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 5,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by Paul Caron
Jennifer Lee Koh (Pepperdine), Race, Immigration Law, and Christianity: Reflections and Tensions Raised by United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm by Ryan Scoville
Continuing with this blog’s coverage of the recently concluded Supreme Court term, I’ll offer a few thoughts on the decision in Bond v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:37 am by Ryan Scoville
On Monday the Supreme Court issued a long-awaited and important decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Cody Poplin
  Her question was whether it would be constitutional for Congress to enact a law requiring the Secretary of State to send an official letter to all foreign ministers whenever a U.S. citizen was born in Jerusalem, announcing that a new American had been born 'in Israel.'  The idea that such a law would be constitutional, said Justice Kagan, 'seems, well, a little bit shocking.'" [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:18 am
  Unfortunately for you, at some point after you were born, they got married. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:31 pm by Harry Styron
The purpose of such statutes is to “guard against testamentary thoughtlessness,” according to the opinion of the Arkansas Court of Appeals in  Robert Dotson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:43 am by azatty
As the news story reminds us, Jerry was not only born when Arizona was still a territory, she also was born before either World War and before women had won the right to vote. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:00 pm by B.W. Barnett
Since Texas remains part of the United States, appellant was born a United States citizen and is not subject to deportation. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:12 am by Jeanne M. Hannah
Haffaker v Huffaker is a child custody dispute involving grandparents with a guardianship in Wayne County and parents who divorced in Utah . . . child born in Utah . . . presented the Court of Appeals (COA) with a unique opportunity to explain how to determine which state has subject matter jurisdiction to make the initial child custody determination. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 9:09 am by Jeanne M. Hannah
Haffaker v Huffaker is a child custody dispute involving grandparents with a guardianship in Wayne County and parents who divorced in Utah . . . child born in Utah . . . presented the Court of Appeals (COA) with a unique opportunity to explain how to determine which state has subject matter jurisdiction to make the initial child custody determination. [read post]