Search for: "BRENNAN v. MOORE"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
Gore, Dames & Moore v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 11:01 am
The following is a guest post from Wendy Weiser and Tom Wolf of the Brennan Center: At the end of his merits brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
Partisan gerrymandering, one of the subjects of the Supreme Court’s important ruling in June in the Moore v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
Milligan and Moore v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:47 am
From Monday's decision in Webber v. [read post]
“Voting Without State Checks and Balances? A Close Look at the Independent State Legislature Theory”
1 Dec 2022, 3:25 pm
The New York City Bar Association hosted this excellent panel discussion, co-sponsored by the Brennan Center, in advance of next week’s oral arguments in Moore v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm
The following is a guest post from Ethan Herenstein of the Brennan Center: In their reply brief defending the independent state legislature theory (ISLT), the petitioners in Moore v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
In Moore v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 7:33 am
Among the more interesting briefs being filed include: ACLU, Evan Bernick, Bipartisan Election officials, Bipartisan election administrators, the Brennan Center, CAC, CLC et al, Democracy and Race scholars, Atiba Ellis, Former… Continue reading [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
The discourse about Moore v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:26 pm
In the coming term, the justices are slated to hear Moore v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
See id. at 105-17; for Fourth Circuit cases so holding, see Brennan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
As Election Meltdown describes, in the Fish v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 5:02 am
The most famous example, I think, is Chicago v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am
” Looking ahead to next week, Thomas Wolf at the Brennan Center for Justice offers “five things to get you up to speed” on Benisek v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Supp. 1217, es parcialmente confirmado y parcialmente revocado.BLACKMUN, J., emitió la opinión de la Corte, en la que se unieron BURGER, CJ, y DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL y POWELL, JJ. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:25 am
Davis and Moore v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” In an op-ed in The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), John Blume weighs in on Moore v. [read post]