Search for: "BRISTOW v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
 Chaired by Mark Brown (Bristows), the panel featured Aimee Nisbet (Hearst Corporation), Eleonora Rosati (University of Southampton and IPKat), Nicholas Saunders (Brick Court Chambers) and Theo Savvides (Bristows). [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:03 am by Vanessa Rieu
Moderator Dominic Adair (Partner, Bristows (UK)) led his panellists Fritz Reiter (Regulatory CMC Team Leader, Sandoz GmbH (AT)), Prof. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
 Struck by this (and because her eyes glazed over that part of the decision), she asked Steven Willis (Bristows) to educate her and our readers about this aspect of the case. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
 Dr Stevenson was an author of a paper relied on as a part of the state of the art. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The right to privacy for a European head of state has hardly been more topical. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
Michael Silverleaf QC also made submissions on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
 Bristows kindly hosted the event, which was jointly organised by the Intellectual Property Office, the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, and the IP Federation. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
 Next Dominic Adair (Bristows LLP) complained very politely about the steps which, following MedImmune v Novartis, patent litigators take to try to minimise hindsight bias when working with experts. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 3:39 am
  The 2017 trial saw the joined claims of Illumina & Sequenom (& Ors) v Premaitha and Illumina & Sequenom v Ariosa (& Ors). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:54 am by John Elwood
That list, which was appended to the government’s brief in oppostion in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
The was a discussion of the case on the Collyer Bristow website by Kate MacMillan. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
 | Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
 The 2014 edition of Chambers & Partners states that "...he has a solid commercial appreciation of what's involved in a case". [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
  These cases, include BIC Leisure v Windsurfing International (1988), Amsted Industry v National Castings (1990), TP Orthodontics v Professional Positioners (1990) and Magna Electronic v TRW Auto Holdings (2015). [read post]