Search for: "BROWN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 21 - 40 of 253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
The District of Columbia remains a segregated city, although the issue before the Court, government enforced racial segregation in public schools, was addressed in Brown, to great international fanfare. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 5:52 pm by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a 57-page Memorandum Opinion handing FDA a victory on the scope of 3-year new clinical investigation exclusivity. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit) rejected a challenge to 2014 EPA rules regulating emission testing requirements for new motor vehicles, 40 C.F.R. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:56 am by Steven Boutwell
District of Columbia, 120 A.3d 623 (D.C. 2015) (defining the term “furnishing” of a hotel room); Louisville/Jefferson county Metro Gov’t v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:56 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The second was federal district court Judge Gerald Bruce Lee of the Eastern District of Virginia in Pro-Football Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, is perhaps best known for her libertarian-like dissent in Nike v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:32 am by Nadia Kayyali
Judge Richard Leon of the District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” Laws and court opinions do not just resolve concrete issues; they provide moral guidance.For example, Brown v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
On August 22, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit published an opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 2:27 pm
"   He opposed Janice Rogers Brown's appointment to the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am by Joy Waltemath
Additionally, genuine issues of fact existed as to whether the department’s conduct was sufficiently extreme and outrageous, so it was for the jury to resolve this issue (Amobi v District of Columbia Department of Corrections, June 27, 2014, Brown, J). [read post]