Search for: "BROWN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 61 - 80 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Dist. of Columbia, Civil Action No. 10-1557 (PLF), 2013 WL 1881547, *11 (D.D.C. [read post]
8 May 2021, 3:09 pm by Larry
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
That day fell on the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, retired Justice John Paul Stevens argues that “[o]verturning [the Supreme Court’s] decision [in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by John R. Vile
Although Brown fell far short of resolving all the issues connected to race, I doubt that, 49 years after Brown, any of these states would have filed a brief asking to return to de jure segregation.By contrast, when the Court decided Roe, only six states and the District of Columbia had legalized abortion. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Thomas B. Griffith
District of Columbia, the en banc held that discriminatory job transfers are actionable under Title VII, expressly overruling its 1999 opinion in Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:42 am by Robert Loeb
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the claims, holding that, under D.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
Amicus briefs in support of the respondent are due Monday in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:28 am by Dan Ernst
  While we're at it, we'll note the publication of The Second Amendment on Trial: Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:58 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Brown, 643 F. 2d 835 (1st Cir., 1981) and Weinberger V. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:24 pm by Amy Howe
District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled that the policy itself is illegal and ordered the government to end it. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:36 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Supreme Court recognized as much in Bolling, but ruled segregation illegal in the District of Columbia anyway. [read post]