Search for: "BROWN v. SCOTT" Results 161 - 180 of 713
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
From a review in NY Magazine by Scott Brown (presumably not the political dreamboat Scott Brown)(links added by me): In 80 dizzy minutes of towering, tottering legalese, hilariously atrocious wigs and highly athletic swivel-chair-ballet, five performer-creators... do the seemingly impossible: They make the Rehnquist Court feel as intellectually rigorous as The Muppet Show. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Jeff Gamso
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:26 am
Involuntary Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of K.T. and Dennis Brown v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:25 am by David Post
The folks over at Mayer Brown, with the Yale Supreme Court clinic, are (more or less) trying to do that; they have submitted a petition for certiorari in the Roberts v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am by Stephen Griffin
  In the process the article raises questions about how we should understand the scope of the achievement of those who sponsored and ratified the Reconstruction amendments.In the last part of “Optimistic Originalism” I discuss why Brown is commonly viewed as a “living constitutionalist” opinion (Here and elsewhere in these posts I put living constitutionalism in scare quotes because I think the real issue is how to understand the process of constitutional change… [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Lord Rodger agreed with Lord Hope, Lord Scott and Lord Brown. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am by David Oscar Markus
” As our country’s experience with stop-and-frisk vividly demonstrates, however, for police, reasonable suspicion is too often synonymous with being a Black or brown person in public.The practice of racially profiling Black drivers was effectively endorsed by the Court in the 1996 ruling in Whren v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
The editorial board of The New York Times criticizes California’s inability to comply with an order (upheld by the Court in its 2011 ruling in Brown v. [read post]