Search for: "BUCHANAN v. STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, Egbert has no bearing on Disney's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against state officials (where both a federal statute and the doctrine of Ex Parte Young provide causes of action).Even so, as Prof Buchanan observed in his essay here yesterday, there is a prima facie similarity between Disney's lawsuit and the challenge to the third version of Trump's Travel Ban that SCOTUS rejected in Trump v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
Even in light of the textual and other points to which Professor Tribe draws our attention, the Supreme Court inProfessor Buchanan argues for his conclusion as follows: he contends that, in Perry v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:34 am by Saima Sheikh
A recent decision by the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division for the First Department, Buchanan Capital Markets, LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:56 pm
In People v Buchanan [4th Dept 6/6/08] (here) the Fourth Department unanimously held that the use of a stun belt that is not visible to the jury is subject to the same judicial scrutiny as other forms of physical restraint that are visible. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
., Room LJ-119, First floor, Thomas Jefferson Building:In his 1858 "House Divided" speech, Abraham Lincoln accused Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney, outgoing President Franklin Pierce, president-elect James Buchanan, and Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas of a conspiracy to perpetuate slavery in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:46 pm by David Bernstein
My confidence in the book did not increase when I saw that MacLean tied the rise of the early libertarian movement to hostility to Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:54 pm by Luke Rioux
In so doing, they distinguished the earlier SCOTUS decision in Buchanan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am by Matrix Law
Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 (“Buchanan”), the House of Lords decided by a 3:2 majority that the broad interpretation should be adopted. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am by The Federalist Society
United States, involving the Treaty Power and the structural limits of federal authority, Schuette v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am by The Federalist Society
United States, involving the Treaty Power and the structural limits of federal authority, Schuette v. [read post]