Search for: "BUFF v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
For Constitutional Law buffs, on Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Snyder v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
The question is whether the state of Montana holds title... [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:12 am
Last week, I commented on United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:12 pm
State Hist. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:57 am
The CAFA home state exception might be forcing some of the smaller, more local class actions that the plaintiff bar initially resisted in the Phillips Petroleum v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:43 am
(God I love state court). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:45 am
Just now... in Walden v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:44 am
There are rumors that there is also video of Prince Harry in the buff quietly being shopped to the highest bidder. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:30 am
In today’s case of the day, Myrtle v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
IX, June 11, 2001.United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
From today’s Washington Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:42 pm
Judge Posner addressed just this point in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
Cohen v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:59 am
– Illus. in: Frank Leslie’s illustrated newspaper, v. 57, 1884 Jan. 5, p. 309. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:18 am
Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, CAMDEN VICINAGE, December 20, 2011: In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:10 pm
Code: the full United States Code with supplements 1925-1988.United States Reports: organized by volume, authoring justice, and major case topic, the digitized version of the official reports of the decisions for the Supreme Court includes all opinions in volumes 1-542, or years 1754-2004.Image from The Law Library of CongressFor History Buffs! [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:03 pm
[Legal Cheek] * King v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:08 pm
What I think is notable about the decision is (1) the number of times that the Court noted that things are different now from the 1999 MOVIE BUFF decision (Brookfield v West Coast Entertainment, 174 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir 1999)); (2) it could have gone the Initial Interest Confusion route on this one, and didn't. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:18 am
And the state flag is buff because George Washington picked that color for the facings of the state's regiment in 1779? [read post]
