Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

Wrongful Death Expert Witness Case Summary

25 Mar 2025, 8:08 pm by Jim Robinson

In the case of Burke v. [read post]

Expert Witness Blog - http://www.expertwitnessblog.com/

The placement of unvaccinated COVID-19 bargaining unit members on leave without pay held not to be arbitrable

25 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press

A. v Hochul, — US &mdash, 142 S Ct 2569 [2022]). [read post]

New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/

The placement of unvaccinated COVID-19 bargaining unit members on leave without pay held not to be arbitrable

25 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press

A. v Hochul, — US &mdash, 142 S Ct 2569 [2022]). [read post]

New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/

Appellate Division finds individual petitioners in this litigation were not entitled to retain a "physically taxing status" for the purpose determining retirement benefits

21 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press

Matter of Croghan v Adams2025 NY Slip Op 01285Decided on March 06, 2025Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: March 06, 2025Before: Kern, J.P., Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, JJ.Index No. 157449/22|Appeal No. 3823|Case No. 2024-00714|[*1]In the Matter… [read post]

New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/

Appellate Division finds individual petitioners in this litigation were not entitled to retain a "physically taxing status" for the purpose determining retirement benefits

21 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press

Matter of Croghan v Adams2025 NY Slip Op 01285Decided on March 06, 2025Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: March 06, 2025Before: Kern, J.P., Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, JJ.Index No. 157449/22|Appeal No. 3823|Case No. 2024-00714|[*1]In the Matter… [read post]

New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/

Section 230 Still Applies to Email Forwarding–Motekaitis v. USI

7 Mar 2025, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman

Burke Section 230 Protects Retweeting–Banaian v. [read post]

Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/

[Josh Blackman] Federal Judge Sanctions Attorneys For Judge-Shopping

25 Feb 2025, 8:05 pm by Josh Blackman

The second, Walker v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

Ninth Circuit Buys a Circuit Split on Available Remedies Under the NLRA

30 Jan 2025, 7:02 am by Joshua Fox and Michael Kratochvil

Macy’s relied in part on United States v. [read post]

Labor Relations Update - http://www.laborrelationsupdate.com

Craighead on the Dormant Commerce Clause and the 21st Amendment

30 Dec 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum

Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's most recent Twenty-First Amendment case, Tennesse Wine & Spirit Retailers Ass'n v. [read post]

Legal Theory Blog - https://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/

Delaware Corporate Law is the Foundation of Our Economy: So Elon Musk and Donald Trump Need to Leave Delaware Alone

11 Nov 2024, 5:51 pm by Steve Bainbridge

” Burks v. [read post]

ProfessorBainbridge.com - http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/

Plaintiff's failure to raise any argument regarding an issue deemed to be an abandonment of plaintiff's claims concerning the issue

1 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press

Decided and Entered: October 29, 2024Before: Singh, J.P., Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, Rosado, O'Neill Levy, JJ. [read post]

New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/

Plaintiff's failure to raise any argument regarding an issue deemed to be an abandonment of plaintiff's claims concerning the issue

1 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press

Decided and Entered: October 29, 2024Before: Singh, J.P., Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, Rosado, O'Neill Levy, JJ. [read post]

New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/

Weekly Roundup: August 30-September 5, 2024

6 Sep 2024, 6:30 am

Rancour, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, September 5, 2024 Tags: APA, FTC, Ryan LLC v. [read post]

The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog - https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/

Weekly Roundup: August 30-September 5, 2024

6 Sep 2024, 6:30 am

Rancour, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, September 5, 2024 Tags: APA, FTC, Ryan LLC v. [read post]

Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance - https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu

The Case of the Ladies Who Lounge

15 Aug 2024, 1:01 pm by centerforartlaw

On the morning of the hearing, Kirsha Kaechele led twenty-five women dressed in navy power suits, pearls, and red lipstick into the courtroom.[28] In a blog post, the artist describes how they “moved in silent synchronicity, crossing and uncrossing their pantyhosed legs [pause], leaning forward in their navy suits [pause], peering over their tortoiseshell spectacles [pause], and applying lipstick” for two hours straight.[29] Even the judge noted their behavior in his ruling,… [read post]

Center for Art Law Blog - http://itsartlaw.com

Court Dissolves Casino Partnership When Notice of Breach is Ignored

12 Aug 2024, 7:00 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.

In Giles v. [read post]

The Business Divorce Law Report - https://www.thebusinessdivorcelawyer.com/

[Eugene Volokh] Moving to Unseal Material in Pennsylvania Sen. Douglas Mastriano's Lawsuit Related to His Ph.D. Thesis

19 Jul 2024, 2:28 pm by Eugene Volokh

" Burke, 698 F.3d at 1242. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

Independent Inventor Pitfalls: Incorrect Inventorship and Why You Should Correct It

15 Jul 2024, 12:39 pm by Holly

[1] Ajinomoto Co., Inc. v. [read post]