Search for: "Back v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 45,816
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2017, 2:53 am by Walter Olson
Tags: Supreme Court, WO writings Back at SCOTUS: limits to state court jurisdiction is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Renee Hutchins
I appreciate the chance to engage with CoOp readers on the United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 5:36 am by dougkans
Back in May, the Minnesota Supreme Court handed down its decision in State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm by Minick Law
Answer: Yes, according to the recent Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm by Ilya Shapiro
The post Symposium: The court begins to strike back at the administrative state appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm by Minick Law
Answer: Yes, according to the recent Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Alvirez Supplemental Brief US Supplemental Brief The Ninth Circuit panel decided this one way back in 2013, but withdrew the opinion to await the en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 6:09 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law With the reported death of Muhammad Ali, f/k/a Cassius Clay, a look back at Clay v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Back when I was a lad, one of the big corporate law issues was the constitutionality of state takeover legislation. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:44 pm by Gene Quinn
Over the last several days I have heard of an alarming trend from the United States Patent and Trademark Office — Patent Examiners are canceling Notices of Allowance and yanking previously granted claims back into prosecution while citing the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Alice v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 3:38 pm by Orin Kerr
Back in August, I wrote a long post about the Ninth Circuit's very dubious computer search and seizure decision in United States v. [read post]