Search for: "Backer v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2013, 6:54 am
On Friday, the U.S.9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
It seems possible that the Circuit Court will now ask both sides in the federal case of Perry v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
In the case, the 9th Circuit in a 2-1 decision (full text) rejected a challenge by backers of California's Proposition 8 to the state's campaign contribution disclosure requirements. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:55 am
Here is the opinion: Thompson v Heineman Turns out Keystone’s backers lost 4-3, but state law required a super majority…. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:28 pm
That was the allegation in the putative class action filed by Lori Wigod in Wigod v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:26 pm
Both cases carry the title Perry v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
United States, and City of Boerne v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:13 am
For our first conversation we focus on Fulton v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 5:40 pm
Establishment Clause jurisprudence-- Everson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:00 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:08 pm
Buono, and Arizona v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
Per the Assistant United States Attorney, the range of loss was between $2,500,000.00 and $7,000,000.00. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 5:43 pm
Our second discussion considered Everson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:06 am
The complaint (full text) in Reproductive Freedom for All v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:37 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:40 pm
Eastern) in the case of Perry, et al., v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
Engle v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
Larry Catá Backer Comment to the Conceptualización. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 12:18 pm
Engle v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 8:29 am
Its backers said it was needed to deter fraud. [read post]