Search for: "Bagley v. Bagley" Results 121 - 140 of 293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Bagley, II, an employee of the City of Rochester, was named as a co-defendant in this action.** Although not all public employees are public officers, except in rare situations all public officers are public employees. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:56 am by Marty Lederman
"  The canon in question was applied by the Chief Justice, on behalf of six Justices, in last year's Bond decision--namely, the “the well-established principle” of Gregory v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 7:27 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 675 n.6 (1985), it is grounded in an understanding of the prosecutor’s “‘special role … in the search for truth in criminal trial,’” Banks v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
Bagley, of Bagley, Karpan, Rose & White, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Defendant): Dale W. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 1:01 pm by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: Passengers blame Disney Cruise Line for injuries, Nov. 11, 2016, By Jenie Mallari-Torres More Blog Entries: Bagley v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:08 am by Josh Blackman
But on further reflection, I agree with a criticism from co-blogger Steve Sachs and Nick Bagley: Footnote 3 is inappropriate. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
On Halbig and statutory interpretation (with a reply to Professor Bagley) — a discussion of the Halbig decision and its significance Why the DC Circuit’s interpretation of the ACA in Halbig v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:22 am by Dean Freeman
Foster Motors, Jan. 9, 2015, Vermont Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Bagley v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am by Amy Howe
  Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the Court’s recent opinion in Armstrong v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:03 am by Howard Bashman
Adler has a post titled “On the Eve of Argument in California v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:33 am by SHG
United States v Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
” At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses whether the Court could opt to stay King v. [read post]