Search for: "Bagley v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Wingerter v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Bagley Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0358p.062008/10/03 USA v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess, Inc… [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:27 am
Bagley, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2008 WL 918712 (N.D. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
Bagley Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0314n.06 Amr v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
Bagley Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0314n.06 Amr v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 8:06 pm
Today, D'Ambrosio v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
This post focuses on the limitations that the ADA imposes on such testing, and concludes that the Seventh Circuit’s approach to the issue in Karraker v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:27 pm
Bagley Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 08a0096p.06 Ramirez-Canales v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bagley, No. 06-3471 In a criminal case, collateral estoppel may only be invoked by the accused. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Bagley, No. 06-3471 In a criminal case, collateral estoppel may only be invoked by the accused. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
BAGLEY, 47 B.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 6:49 am
" [18] V. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bagley, No. 05-4461 I'n a capital case in which petitioner was convicted of murdering his sons as they lay sleeping, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where state courts' rejection of a claim that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance during the penalty phase of the trial by failing adequately to investigate his mental-health history and background, was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Bagley, No. 04-4289Dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case is affirmed over a meritless claim that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Bagley Northern District of Ohio at ToledoALICE M. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 1:32 pm
" The juror case is Reynolds v. [read post]
