Search for: "Bagley v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am
” At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses whether the Court could opt to stay King v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Republicans Don’t Know What to Do with Their Bad-Faith ACA Case By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley compares the vigorous support the first Supreme Court case against the Affordable Care Act garnered from the conservative establishment and Republican party against the far weaker backing for the current case, California v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm
As he wrote in dissent in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
By: Colleen V. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 1:38 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Steiger & Steiger v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 7:27 pm
” 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963); see also United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Bagley in 1985. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm
Bagley in 1985. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:44 pm
" United States v, Bagley, 473 U.S. at 678, Quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:48 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:11 pm
Bagley, a Member in McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC's Labor & Employment Practice Group in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Yesterday’s oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm
Bagley grants a new direct appeal (or in the alternative an issuance of the writ) based on ineffective assistance of appellate counsel relating failure to raise on appeal a state law right to allocution claim under Ohio law. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
Next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
"The first prong of the test addresses the question: Has the petitioner “stated a cause of action. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm
California v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm
And in State v. [read post]
