Search for: "Bailey v. Bailey" Results 221 - 240 of 1,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2013, 11:22 am by johntfloyd
To understand the Chunon Bailey case, one must begin with a basic understanding of two Supreme Court decisions: Michigan v. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 11:22 am by John Floyd
To understand the Chunon Bailey case, one must begin with a basic understanding of two Supreme Court decisions: Michigan v. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 11:22 am by johntfloyd
To understand the Chunon Bailey case, one must begin with a basic understanding of two Supreme Court decisions: Michigan v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by Ellen D. Marcus
Scrooge - Holiday Adventures in Employment Law Cratchit v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 215 The appellant, Angrove’s PTY is an Australian winemaker, which employed D&D Wines International Ltd as its agent and distributor in the UK and entered into an Agency and Distribution Agreement (“ADA”). [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:03 am
The California Supreme Court unanimously holds today that even the single use of an unambiguous racial epithet (e.g., the "n-word") can potentially actionable constitute racial harassment in the workplace.In my (academic) sphere, there are differing opinions about whether it's appropriate (or wise) to use actual racial epithets, rather than a shorthand, when discussing particular cases in which those words appear. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:36 pm by Dan Ernst
  Here is the sbstract:In National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:43 pm by Shaheen Rahman
Updated | Bailey & Others v London Borough of Brent Council [2011] EWHC 2572 (Admin) – Read judgment Every Wednesday my daughter looks forward to the arrival of the mobile library at her nursery. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 5:08 am by David Oscar Markus
  DOJ had the chutzpah to cite to Sheppard v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Eric Claeys (George Mason/Scalia) on Penn Central v. [read post]