Search for: "Bailey v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 624
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2016, 2:34 pm by Aimee Hess
Last year, the Texas Supreme Court decided the case of Coyote Lake Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Amoena (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 7 June 2016 Bailey & Anor v Angove’s PTY Ltd, heard 8 June 2016 R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc, heard on 16 June 2016 Secretary of State for the Home Department v FV (Italy), heard on 21 June Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners plc,… [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 8:58 am by Colin E. Flora
The discussion in the case from April, Community Health Network v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Amoena (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 7 June 2016 Bailey & Anor v Angove’s PTY Ltd, heard 8 June 2016 R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc, heard on 16 June 2016 [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:23 pm by randywallace
 The one bite rule and strict liability approaches are not uniform from state to state. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:29 am by Lorene Park
The younger bus driver who was not fired was not as culpable because the driver wasn’t tasked with watching over students while driving (Bailey v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am by INFORRM
  In doing so, he referred to the leading authority Proctor v Bailey(1889) 42 Ch 390, which states that “… an injunction is granted for prevention, and where there is no ground for apprehending the repetition of a wrongful act there is no ground for an injunction“. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:20 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]