Search for: "Bailey v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 922
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
’ Bailey v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:09 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:24 pm
In Blancarte v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:17 pm
In reversing in the interest of justices, the Court wroteas defendant correctly contends, the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of the People's witnesses during both his opening and closing statements (see People v LaDolce, 196 AD2d 49, 57; see generally People v Bailey, 58 NY2d 272, 277-278). [read post]
18 Feb 2006, 9:49 am
"Also, in Bailey v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 2:05 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm
The appeal, known as ETK v NGN Ltd , was listed in private. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
The defence case in the phone hacking trial at the Old Bailey did not begin until Thursday 20 February 2014. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Bailey, 1 Cal. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:06 am
Farmer, John, and V. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:01 am
Abakporo further alleges that this purported George Alston gave him a New York State Identification Card and the checks which had been issued by Pierre. [read post]
1 May 2007, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
Bailey, The Bailey Law Firm, Medina, for Appellants Bruce Iacovelli and Windward Enterprises Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Cobb, Rachel V.; D. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
We find that Speedway has satisfied its burden on this issue and AFFIRM the district court's judgment. 07a0437p.06 Bailey v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:44 pm
Neither this Court nor the motion court is " required to shut its eyes to the patent falsity of a defense' " (id., quoting MRI Broadway Rental v United States Min. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Leschinski v Bailey; 2012 NY Slip Op 30202(U); January 11, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County; Docket Number: 1934/10; Judge: R. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because we find that Staunch was not an "eligible employee" under the FMLA and her state law claims are without merit, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of summary judgment to Continental. 08a0005p.06 Auletta v. [read post]
