Search for: "Baker v. Brown*"
Results 301 - 320
of 362
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
See McDarby v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Miller Baker of McDermott Will & Emery in Washington, DC will argue for the petitioners. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
" The two dissenting judges (Erdmann & Ryan, JJ.) argued that the majority's approach was precluded by United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:54 am
State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:44 am
Jianniney v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Less active were Baker, Hecht and Wiggins. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Baker Hostetler Blog-Tolerant This blog was mentioned on Paul G. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Court of First Instance rejects Lego’s appeal against OHIM’s Board of Appeals decision that Lego brick shape not registrable as a Community trade mark (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) OHIM opposition quality standards – the Office responds (IPKat) Charlie McCreevy puts forward proposal to reduce CTM fees by about 40% (Managing Intellectual Property) (Class 46) New protected geographical indications: French PGI Boeuf de Bazas for fresh meat and offal; Finnish PGI Kainuun… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 9:21 pm
BAKER, CHIEF JUDGE BAKER, C.J., MATHIAS, J., CONCUR. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
Introduction Part I and Part II of this series reviewed the historical background and technology of food irradiation, and the food safety implications relating to FDA’s recent approval of a new rule for use of ionizing irradiation as a processing step in fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:58 pm
Huff, et al. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 3:34 pm
Baker, Judge Paul D. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
Prickett v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:10 pm
[ILB Note] Although the opinion indicates "BAKER, C. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:33 pm
" David Baker v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:00 pm
Norris v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 5:08 pm
BAKER, C.J., concurs. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:55 pm
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Chief Judge Baker, Judges May and Brown. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
BAKER, C.J. dissents with opinion: [which begins] Although I very much agree in principle with the result reached by the majority, I believe that we are compelled by Willis v. [read post]