Search for: "Baker v. Brown*" Results 121 - 140 of 327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
'Due regard' under s.71 Race Relations Act meant appropriate in the circumstances ( Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141), including the countervailing factors. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
'Due regard' under s.71 Race Relations Act meant appropriate in the circumstances ( Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141), including the countervailing factors. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am by Eugene Volokh
(Image used with permission) I’m pleased to report that my Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic student Ashley Phillips and I just filed an amicus brief last week on behalf of the Cato Institute, in Baker v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 12:04 pm by William A. Ruskin
In particular, the amici emphasize the application of the “political question” doctrine, and focus in on the second test stated in Baker v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:47 pm
CAAF's new opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Rulings               IPSO has published a series of rulings and a Resolution Statement from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 00920-18 Hallam-Baker v Daily Mail – Resolved via IPSO mediation involving Principles 1 Accuracy, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock and 6 Children 00014-18 Temple v Witney Gazette – No breach of Principle 1 Accuracy after investigation 20563-17 Versi… [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 1:11 pm by Dale Carpenter
He first concluded that the whole constitutional question of same-sex marriage was actually decided in 1971 by the Supreme Court in a memorandum opinion in Baker v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
Lewisham relied on Simon Brown J (as he was) in R v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
Lewisham relied on Simon Brown J (as he was) in R v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The balance between privacy and transparency in regard to disclosing MPs’ expenses was comprehensively settled by the High Court in 2008, following a trilogy of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) appeals in the then Information Tribunal: Leapman [pdf], Baker [pdf] and Moffat [pdf]. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:22 am
It's McCambridge Limited v Joseph Brennan Bakeries [2014] IEHC 269, a recent High Court (Commercial Division) ruling of the thoughtful and erudite Mr Justice Charleton dating back to 27 May. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Lev Sugarman
Pildes unpacked the implications of the 1983 INS v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
And April Doss defended the 9th Circuit’s reading of the government’s ability to use information collected through 702 surveillance in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:48 am by Mark Graber
  If the measure of success is policy change, progressives are sitting pretty with Trump more likely to stall further progress somewhat than reverse the clock to 1972 (the year before Roe v. [read post]