Search for: "Baker v. Carr"
Results 61 - 80
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2010, 9:20 am
And yet, as we argue in this Essay, the Court’s handling of the problems since its initial intervention in Baker v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Here is the abstract: A critical overview of judicial activity in the democracy area since Baker v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
Sims and Baker v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:50 am
After all, Baker v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:55 am
Baker said. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 10:54 am
As a consequence of Baker and a later case, Reynolds v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:30 am
The modern political question doctrine first emerged in Baker v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:09 am
Vitale (1962), Baker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
Sims (1964) 377 U.S. 533; Baker v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 7:41 pm
Carr, which led to Gray v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
Carr, Reynolds v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
She began with a lengthy analysis of the six factors the Court put forward in Baker v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:12 am
Connecticut v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:34 am
By analyzing changes Frankfurter made to this sentence in the drafts leading to his dissenting opinion in Baker v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
"I'm not so sure that this is true, and I didn't have to strain to come up with a counter-example: Felix Frankfurter, appointed by FDR, voted to uphold the expulsion of Jehovah's Witnesses who refused to pledge the flag at school; voted with the minority in Baker v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps finds echoes of past justices in the case, arguing that the modern democracy shaped by the court’s 1962 decision in Baker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:25 pm
The Court easily distinguished cases such as Baker v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:28 am
Madison; but its modern application stems from Baker v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
” With the redistricting process drawing nearer, Kenneth Jost of Jost on Justice argues that although the Court “struck a major struck a major blow for political democracy a half century ago by establishing the ‘one person, one vote’ rule for electoral districts” in Baker v. [read post]
