Search for: "Baker v. Clement" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2019, 7:38 am by Dan Bressler
It seeks to disqualify not only Jones Day, but also the city attorneys in San Clemente and city attorneys for Jones Day’s other clients. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
By 1961, his position had not changed, and he attempted to sway Justice Potter Stewart to his side while Baker v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 12:27 am by David Cheifetz
Anderson v Braun, 2017 SKCA 93 [38] On the basis of paragraph 12 of Clements, the traditional “but for” test presumptively applies to the case of multiple actors creating a loss. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At truthdig, Bill Blum discusses partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:38 pm by Howard Knopf
Now Blacklock’s seems to want to call time out – apparently on all but one of its now baker’s dozen of such cases. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Garrett Epps in The Atlantic, who observes that over the years since Baker v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Boehner (R-Ohio ) in Washington on Oct. 27, 2015. ( Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg) In House of Representatives v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008), only addressed the narrow issue of whether punitive damages were preempted by the Clean Water Act and that this narrowness accounted for the Court’s need in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
But then a decision in the Eleventh Circuit upholding Judge Vincent and the skillful advocacy of Paul Clement shook my confidence – even after remarkable opinions by Judges Sutton and Silberman upholding the Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
Lochnerians" is a reference to the much-maligned 1905 case of Lochner v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:12 am by Dale Carpenter
The panel was careful to say that its decision did not invalidate state marriage laws excluding same-sex couples because, in part, only the Supreme Court could do so under its own precedent in Baker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story.   [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We have a wealth of varying viewpoints on AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
USA Today’s The Oval blog provides Joan Biskupic’s report on Kagan’s appearance at the conference; when former Solicitor General Paul Clement and Erwin Chemerinsky of U.C. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]