Search for: "Baker v. Employment Appeal Bd." Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 4:44 am
An official significantly involved in the prosecution of a disciplinary action brought against an employee should not participate in making the final determination Ashe v Town Bd. of The Town of Crown Point, N.Y., 2012 NY Slip Op 05693, Appellate Division, Third Department The Town Board of the Town of Crown Point filed disciplinary charges against one of its employees pursuant to Civil Service Law §75. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In Baker v Irondequoit CSD, 70 NY2d 314, the Court of Appeals held that a union's duty to process a former employee's grievance, under some circumstances, survives the employee's separation.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_07272.htm [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
§ 794(a)], sue his employer for its alleged failure to accommodate his sleeping disorder [see Collins v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Reyes, 272 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Tex. 2008) (noting that, by enacting the TCHRA, the Texas Legislature "intended to correlate state law with federal law in employment discrimination cases") (quoting Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
The Petitioning Creditors allege in the petition that they are owed unpaid wages and salary related to their employment with Tagnetics. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]