Search for: "Baker v. General Motors Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Schachtman
General Motors Corp., 2009 WL 1034487 (Del.Super. 2009) Benzene Knight v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:09 am by emagraken
Ganzer) the Plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle collision. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
First Quality Baby Products (Gray on Claims) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Pet-door patent dispute over jurisdiction clarified: Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
 Arbitrators are well situated to answer that question”) (citation omitted; emphasis in original); Southland Corp. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am by Christine Corcos
In 1981, Judge Vanessa Ruiz of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals successfully argued Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
Baby you CA drive my KA General Court judgment in Ford Motor Company v OHIM, Alkar Automotive, SA. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
… It seemed better on all sides to work together,” city General Counsel Cindy Laquidara told board members as she explained the settlement proposal. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Michael Aubele, Valley News Dispatch, April 27, 2010 The federal Environmental Protection Agency and Allegheny County Health Department want a federal judge to sign off on an agreement with Allegheny Ludlum Corp. and Harsco Corp. intended to control slag dust at the Ludlum steel mill in Natrona. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Thermo-Ply (PATracer) Honeywell – Patentee appeals finding of patent invalidity under on-sale bar provisions of § 102(b): Honeywell v Nikon (PATracer) Nalco – Nalco appeals from grant of preliminary injunction against it from infringement patent directed to method of removing or transferring metals and/or amines from crude oil: Baker Hughes v Nalco (PATracer) Nutriset - Access to food now an IP issue? [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]