Search for: "Baker v. Harrington" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2017, 8:39 am by Neil Burns
The Bankruptcy Court Rules Against A Deceptive Attorney In a ruling by the First Circuit Court of Appeals, entitled Baker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:39 am by Neil Burns
The Bankruptcy Court Rules Against A Deceptive Attorney In a ruling by the First Circuit Court of Appeals, entitled Baker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:39 am by Neil Burns
The Bankruptcy Court Rules Against A Deceptive Attorney In a ruling by the First Circuit Court of Appeals, entitled Baker v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:49 am by sally
Supreme Court Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Ltd & Ors (Ver 2) [2011] UKSC 17 (6 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jenson & Anor v Faux [2011] EWCA Civ 423 (13 April 2011) Garratt v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 425 (13 April 2011) Secretary of State for the Foreign Office & Commonwealth Affairs v Maftah & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 350 (13 April 2011) Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences v The Albert… [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:02 am
Harrington (NFP) Scott Hashberger v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Washington under Section 2254(d)(1); and (3) whether the lower court misapplied Harrington v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
In a case such as this, where there was a marriage of long duration and a lengthy period of separation before the hearing of applications for property settlement, during which time significant assets were accumulated by one or both parties, it should indicate that in such circumstances it may be more useful to undertake an assessment of contributions on an asset by asset, or, category of asset by category of asset basis: see Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17; (1986) 161 CLR 513.Stephen Page,… [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm by Yishai Schwartz
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm by Daniel Richardson
State, 166 Vt. 246 (1997)(school funding law unconstitutional); Baker v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:00 am by Stephen Page
For example, in Brandt v Brandt (1997) FLC 92-758 the Full Court said this (at 84,343):This mathematical adjustment suffers from the same defect as that mentioned above. [read post]