Search for: "Baker v. People"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The trust is publicum juris, that is, for the whole People of the State (citing People v Grant, 306 NY 258; City of New York v Rice, 198 NY 124). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The trust is publicum juris, that is, for the whole People of the State (citing People v Grant, 306 NY 258; City of New York v Rice, 198 NY 124). [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The Supreme Court will hear the libel appeal in Serafin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:05 am
The New Jersey Superior Court Case (Middlesex County) of Baker v. [read post]
A California Judge Allows a Baker to Discriminate Against a Lesbian Couple Who Wanted a Wedding Cake
7 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
” And in Roberts v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:25 am
Earlier today, the ACLU and the ACLU of Vermont announced a fantastic settlement that we obtained in Baker & Linsley v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
The case of Richard Burgon MP v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am
” Slate’s Amicus podcast features a discussion of Gill v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 10:12 am
The case was Prigg v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm
First, he concluded that the summary Supreme Court ruling in Baker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:08 pm
The argument that it does will run into Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
By 1961, his position had not changed, and he attempted to sway Justice Potter Stewart to his side while Baker v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
” So wrote Justice Felix Frankfurter in his dissenting opinion in Baker v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
In Lee v. [read post]