Search for: "Baker v. Selden" Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm by Michael Risch
In my 2014 post, I noted how Sega put it: “To the extent that a work is functional or factual, it may be copied,Baker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:37 pm by Brian Frye
It grew out of a question that Zvi Rosen asked on Facebook: Why is Baker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:46 am
 The judge considered the following issues in coming to the conclusion that copyright did not subsist in the copied code:Declaring Source CodeMerger doctrine - the merger doctrine, established in Baker v Selden 101 US 99 (1879), disallows exclusive ownership of the expression. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:00 am by Michael Risch
But Sega is crystal clear that we do allow interoperability reuse: “To the extent that a work is functional or factual, it may be copied,Baker v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am by Andres
Vocabulary and grammar are no more protectable than the bookkeeping system in Baker v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Jani Ihalainen
Baker v Selden, dealing with the protection (or lack thereof) for a book-keeping system, and Palmer v Braun, dealing with the protectability of meditation exercises, illustrate the unavailability of copyright protection for ideas, even if they are 'expressed' in some sort of tangible form.Ultimately, the Sequence was deemed to be not protected by copyright. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD530 .P83 v. 132John Baker, ed., Selected Readings and Commentaries on Magna Carta 1400-1604 (London: Seldon Society, 2015). [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:30 pm by Dennis Crouch
Selden that copyrights protects expression in works of authorship and patents protect utilitarian designs. [read post]