Search for: "Baker v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 3,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm by Hyemin Han
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in NetChoice v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 12:21 pm by Kevin
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a "tangible object" (United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 2:59 pm by Hyemin Han
Cooper argues that cross-border data requests between states for abortion-related investigations may start to resemble cross-border requests between countries and trigger new conflicts of law following the Supreme Court’s June ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Second Circuit’s decision vacating his conviction was issued on September 20, 2017 (see United States v Brooks, 872 F3d 78, 96 [2d Cir 2017]) and this case was not commenced until September 2021. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
The SEC stated that “the Commission will hold investment advisers accountable when they do not accurately describe their incorporation of ESG factors into their investment selection process. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]