Search for: "Baker v. US Through US Dept. of Labor"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
US Dept of Labor Department of Labor (except OSHA) 08a0282n.06 Tipton v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
On June 21, the Court in Lucia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
They can be considered independent contractors in spite of California’s use of its “ABC test” to determine employment status [see Quinn v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
http://j.st/GmY Field v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
"o o April 1, 2009 decision hereo o SCOTUS docket hereo o SCOTUSwiki hereo o Noted here: Baker Hostetler; Colorado Employment Law Blog; ConstangyArgued - Awaiting DecisionAT&T v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Dept. of Professional Regulation, 596 So.2d 450, 452 (Fla. 1992) (“Attorney’s fees incurred while prosecuting or defending a claim are not recoverable in the absence of a statute or contractual agreement authorizing their recovery. [read post]
