Search for: "Baldwin v. Baldwin" Results 201 - 220 of 617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 5:24 am by Rosalind English
JEG v  The Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan  [2012] EWCA Civ 938 Elizabeth Anne-Gumbel QCand Justin Levinson of One Crown Office Row acted for the claimant in this case. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:09 am by Lyle Denniston
  On September 15, they filed a petition for review in the Supreme Court, prior to any decision by the Circuit Court (Baldwin, et al., v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:05 am
., Inc. v Baldwin Union Free School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 04461, Appellate Division, Second Department Francesco Pignataro, an employee of the Baldwin Union Free School District, filed a grievance and a demand for arbitration alleging that the District wrongly removed him from the payroll. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:05 am
., Inc. v Baldwin Union Free School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 04461, Appellate Division, Second Department Francesco Pignataro, an employee of the Baldwin Union Free School District, filed a grievance and a demand for arbitration alleging that the District wrongly removed him from the payroll. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:43 pm by admin
Supreme Court issued a really significant anti-consumer decision in the case of AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:20 pm by Elie Mystal
[Recess Appointments] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Alec Baldwin, Arizona, Arizona v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 9:04 pm
This is the train of citations (Sidhom is not pertinent): Thomas (2002): The defendant, however, bears the ultimate burden of proving, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the evidence should not be used against him (see, People v Berrios, supra at 367; People v Baldwin, 25 NY2d 66, 70; People v Whitehurst, 25 NY2d 389, 391; Nardone v United States, 308 US 338, 341-342), and that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him (see, People… [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 6:47 pm by Lyle Denniston
  However, the Justices refused to do so on Nov. 8 in Baldwin, et al., v. [read post]