Search for: "Baldwin v. Baldwin" Results 41 - 60 of 613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2012, 1:58 am by sally
“Tim Baldwin analyses the decision of the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon and its impact on costs in judicial review cases.” Full story Garden Court Chambers Blog, 14th May 2012 Source: [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:44 am
Jane Lambert In Cosmetic Warriors Ltd and Another v Ltd and Another [2014] EWHC 181 Mr John Baldwin QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, had to decide whether causing advertising  to appear on an an Internet user's screen for products that competed with those of the claimants whenever  the user entered the claimants' trade mark into a search box amounted to an [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:24 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An intellectual property lawyer for Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. of Feasterville, Pennsylvania has sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Alice Baldwin and two limited liability companies, all of Evansville, Indiana and doing business as Bucks Tavern, unlawfully intercepted and broadcast the "Rousey v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:15 pm by Patent Docs
By Alison Baldwin -- Just before the July 4th holiday, the Federal Circuit issued its ruling in Fresenius USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:13 am by Steve Statsinger
Baldwin, No. 09-1725-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by Nabiha Syed
Yesterday the Court denied certiorari in Baldwin v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Second, evidence that looks like a smoking gun may fizzle out when motion practice rolls around.The case is Baldwin v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
The most important aspect of this case is the Third Circuit’s interpretation of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 7:04 am by Daily Record Staff
Baldwin as administrator of his mother Viola Baker’s (“Mother”) estate.1 He advances a broad array of ... [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
A Little Reminder to the PTO about Due Process and the Importance of Objective Evidence of Non-Obviousness By Alison Baldwin -- In its decision on September 24th, the Federal Circuit reminded the Patent Office that the principles of due process are still alive and kicking and cannot be ignored by the Patent Office's judiciary. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 5:16 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Holsey wanted the determination that he is not intellectually disabled reconsidered after Hall v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:06 pm by Stephen Page
In the recent Full Court of the Family Court case of Baldwin and Baldwin, there were three main issues:whether the husband's mother and brother should have intervened in the proceedings; what debts should be included in the asset pool; andwhether a tax debt should be included.1. [read post]