Search for: "Baldwin v. New York" Results 41 - 60 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2009, 4:47 am
Baldwin Union Free School Dist., 320 F.3d 164, 169 (2d Cir.2003) [*14] (citation omitted); see also Albert v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:42 am
Bonnette v Long Island College Hosp., 3 NY3d 281 (2004); Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 (1984). [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:29 pm by ALeonard
  Cases that were bought quickly in response to popular pressure were mainly unsuccessful, with narrow state high court losses (and passionate dissents) in New York, Oregon, Washington State and Maryland. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:12 am
Patrick's Old Cathedral — which is in Little Italy in New York, prompting one Yelpist to say "it's funny when the patron saint of another country is in the wrong ethnic neighborhood. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am by David Kopel
The concealed carry ban in the new state of Kentucky was soon ruled unconstitutional in Bliss v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am by Jacob Schulz
Before the Hutaree case, the Justice Department had brought seditious conspiracy charges only three times in the previous 20 years: twice for small U.S. al-Qaeda cells and once for the Blind Sheikh and other al-Qaeda operatives responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and a planned spree of terror attacks around the New York area. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:35 am
Back on August 19th, I posted about the Baldwin v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Gregory Antollino read a New York Times article about Baldwin in his office one day. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:27 am
Gojcaj, supra.Gojcaj “subsequently traveled to Bedford, New York. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse worries about “the growing threat that an increasingly weaponized free-exercise clause poses to civil society,” particularly now that the court has agreed to consider whether to “overturn a 30-year-old decision, Employment Division v. [read post]