Search for: "Baldwin v. State of North Carolina"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2021, 4:48 am
Baldwin v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 7:08 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled on May 4 that although several criminal sex crimes statutes of the state specifically provide that it is not a crime for young teens within three years of age to engage in various forms of consensual sexual activity, this exception does not apply under the state's antique "crime against nature" sodomy law. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 12:01 pm
State v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:25 am
First Flight Limited Partnership) and North Carolina (Strategic Outsourcing, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:10 am
Cosigners of the letter include senators Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Ron Wyden of Oregon, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Mark Kirk of Illinois, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Claire McCaskill of Missouri. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 11:42 am
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on April 6, 2021. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
North Carolina v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm
State of Hawaii complements the Circuit's en banc from five years earlier, Peruta v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:38 am
Wade [comments]North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 63, Issue 2 (January 1985), pp. 375-386Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (Cited 2619 times)63 N.C. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:01 pm
To steal an example from Professor Don Regan, even if the state of Michigan had a very strong anti-smoking policy, it could not ban the manufacture of cigarettes in North Carolina, only the importation of those cigarettes into Michigan. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Concluding that a discriminatory effect (not a discriminatory intent) is all that is necessary to trigger the Baldwin test of a significant state interest and no non-discriminatory alternatives available, the Court invalidated North Carolina's apple-grading law.So. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
North Carolina, the Court considered age a relevant factor in determining whether a 13-year-old was “in custody” and entitled to a reading of his Miranda rights during an interview conducted in his middle-school conference room. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
§ 4327(b). [3] See Baldwin v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
McDowell was prosecuted under the South Carolina statute and convicted. [4]. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
While the case was still pending, the EEOC issued a decision in Baldwin v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
